Who Taught Whom?

I was so pleased to tell Lee Hambro Read More »

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed

Q is for Quiet

Sometimes, in practicing, we play louder and louder, more and more coarsely, and wonder why Read More »

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed

K is for Knowledge

“Before God and as an honest man,” said Haydn to Leopold Mozart, “I tell you that your son is the greatest composer known to me either in person or by name. He has taste and, what is more, the most profound knowledge of composition.” In saying, “what is more,” was he rating knowledge above taste? Or did he simply mean, “in addition”?

In either event, he rated knowledge highly and did not mention inventive ability or depth. Perhaps he took those for granted, or thought that Wolfgang Mozart’s having them was too obvious to need comment. I wonder about these things, as I do about Raymond Chandler saying that what interested him in writing was “the creation of emotion through dialog and description.” Note that he doesn’t say narrative.

Haydn’s personal generosity is clear, for he had been established as a composer before Mozart began writing. So when he disapproved of portions of his student Beethoven’s work—finding the parts we consider most “Beethovenian” exaggerated or tasteless—he must really not have “got” Beethoven. It wasn’t lack of generosity, but a profound difference in personality. In Beethoven, the Self is front and center; its Journey is the topic. In Haydn, the Self is implicit. This parallels the composers’ social situations: Haydn the retainer to a noble family, Beethoven in control of his own economic destiny.

Despite differences, however, the three composers had in common their regard for that “knowledge of composition” that Haydn rated so highly. Beethoven’s technical studies were life-long; and when Mozart heard Bach for the first time—long after Bach’s death—he said, “At last, someone from whom one may learn.” Geniuses aren’t just more creative than others; they’re better students, too.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed

T is for Temperamental

“The temperamental artist”: a cliché to make a performer smile. Read More »

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed

R is for the Risk of Rationalism

Understanding, explaining, teaching—these wonderful “verbal-intellectual” activities Read More »

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed

P is for Profligate

To master the great works, we must be Read More »

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed

I is for Intention

Here’s a little pencil-and-paper exercise with profound implications: Draw a staff and write a bar or two of melody. Put a crescendo over a few notes and an accent on one of them, or whatever expression marks you choose.

Now try to imagine that a composer could make such marks and not mean the performer to pay attention to them.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed

G is for Goal-Oriented

The One True Approach to Technique—do all instrumentalists look for it  Read More »

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed

B is for Boredom, a Creative Force

Displeased with my playing of a passage, I turn off the lights. Sitting at the piano in the dark Read More »

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed

E is for Efficient Practice

Contrary to what many non-musicians Read More »

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed