{"id":1264,"date":"2013-10-01T10:30:03","date_gmt":"2013-10-01T17:30:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/boykonpiano.com\/?p=1264"},"modified":"2013-10-01T10:25:50","modified_gmt":"2013-10-01T17:25:50","slug":"pianos-unlike-furniture-need","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/boykonpiano.com\/archives\/1264","title":{"rendered":"Pianos, Unlike Furniture, Need…"},"content":{"rendered":"
The pianos are often good brands, too. Bought new, not cheap. If they gave value for money, what value was not spoiled by letting them degrade from Day One? Were they just for looking<\/i> good to donors who paid for them? For carrying a famous brand name? For advertising our cul-chah<\/i>?<\/p>\n
Or was the intended purpose truly musical, in which case, something has went wrong! Is it the well-known difficulty of raising money for maintenance compared to capital expenditure? Can we change maintenance into<\/i> capital expenditure? When Stephen Ross offered the U. of Michigan’s Business School 50 million bucks to name the school for him, the Dean thought for a moment and said coolly, “Make it a hundred.” Can we take a cue from this inspiring story, and instead of raising a piano’s mere purchase price from a donor, raise three times the price, using the extra to endow maintenance? The plaque inscribed, “Gift of Mr. & Mrs. Brad Donor,” will read instead,<\/p>\n
\nIts Maintenance in Perpetuity<\/i>
\nThe Generous Gift of
\nMr. & Mrs. Bradley T. Donor
\n<\/center>\n<\/div>\n